Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today
See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.
Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.
How to use this page
[edit]- Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
- Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
- Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
- Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
- Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
- Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
- If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
- Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
- Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
- Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
- Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
- Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.
Special notes
[edit]Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.
Discussion for Today
[edit]- This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_February_4
February 4
[edit]NEW NOMINATIONS
[edit]Category:Russian sculptors by federal subject
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Russian sculptors by federal subject to Category:Russian sculptors
- Propose merging Category:Russian ceramists by federal subject to Category:Russian ceramists
- Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layers that aren't unhelpful for navigation. These only contain folks from Dagestan. SMasonGarrison 13:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Women dictators
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: There is no super-category because of a previous deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 22#Category:Dictators. This category suffers from the same fault: being an indeterminate category where subjective judgements are made regarding inclusion. This does not strike me as a verifiable, neutral or defining category as described at Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing articles. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete; "dictator" is a value judgment and not something that can really be determined clearly enough for a category to not suffer from immense issues. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Lithuanian guerrillas killed in action
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Lithuanian guerrillas killed in action to Category:Lithuanian guerrillas
- Nominator's rationale: reparent and rename. This redudant category layer is missing the parent category of Category:Lithuanian guerrillas SMasonGarrison 05:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Just delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. The subcat is adequately parented by Category:Lithuanian partisans. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Fine with me SMasonGarrison 13:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Ante-Nicene Christian martyrs
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Ante-Nicene Christian martyrs to Category:Ancient Christian martyrs
- Nominator's rationale: per parent Category:Ancient Christian saints and Category:Ancient Christians. Also, the category tree contains articles well beyond the First Council of Nicaea. For example Abda and Abdisho died in 376. After the rename, Category:5th-century Christian martyrs can be added as a subcategory too. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: isn't there a distinct purpose in a category for Christians martyred prior to the widespread adoption of Christianity in the Roman Empire? I realize that the date for this is a bit fuzzy, but the Council of Nicaea seems as reasonable a date as any. Those martyred afterward would seem to have been martyred for different reasons—perhaps a case could be made for including those martyred by Romans who had yet to convert, though Abda and Abdisho apparently were martyred for a different reason and beyond Roman borders, so they and some others could probably be removed from this category.
- Perhaps the solution could be a category titled "Ancient Christian martyrs" with a subcategory for Ante-Nicene martyrs, and which would separately include late Roman (or other) martyrs such as Abda and Abdisho. That would simply be a revision to the "martyr tree", so to speak. I note that I come at this from a non-Christian perspective; I am not particularly fond of the concept of martyrdom, but it is a valid topic in religious history, and it seems to make sense to distinguish between those who were martyred due to anti-Christian persecution by Romans and those martyred post-persecution elsewhere (*wonders if there are Post-Nicene pagan martyrs*). If this category is not preserved, then that distinction would be lost, and probably not to the benefit of the reader. P Aculeius (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- There are enough articles just mentioning a death in the 4th century without specifying whether it was before or after 325, so the distinction isn't clear anyway. Besides Christianity became an accepted religion quite a few years before Nicaea. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Before the reign of Constantine (312–337) Christianity was widely persecuted, so there would have been many Christians martyred within the Roman empire. Though various dates from 311 (edict of Serdica) to 337 (death, and alleged deathbed conversion of Constantine, who may or may not have adopted Christianity informally as early as 312) could be used, the council of Nicaea, which he convened in 325, is a significant date in establishing a degree of uniformity for Christian worship, and probably did more to promote its acceptance than dubious stories about the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. After this it would be rare for Christians to be martyred within the Roman Empire, though of course they could be anywhere else that Christianity wasn't yet tolerated or adopted, and would continue to be for centuries. So it makes good sense to distinguish martyrs before 325 and after—or at least martyrs due to Roman persecution, which probably did not end all at once as soon as some decree was issued at Rome, though it probably had by the end of Constantine's reign—from later martyrs elsewhere. P Aculeius (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- So what do you suggest we do with Category:4th-century Christian martyrs with its many articles not specifying a year or specifying a year after 325? Should this subcategory be purged? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since some of the contents of "4th-century Christian martyrs" are ante-Nicene, it can remain as a subcategory, the same as "Ford" could remain under "20th-century automobile manufacturers" even though it continues in business in the 21st century. Subcategories will often be partial matches for multiple parent categories. P Aculeius (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- But then the difference with "Ancient" as proposed is only the 5th century. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Assuming that the 5th century topic includes the entire century, then "Ancient Christian martyrs" would cover a span of about 450 years—about 275 before Nicaea, 175 after. That doesn't seem unreasonable as a division of the span, since each group would tend to share certain characteristics—most ante-Nicene martyrs would have been martyred in the Roman Empire either as part of or inspired by official persecutions; post-Nicaea most Christian martyrs would have been martyred elsewhere or for other reasons. P Aculeius (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- But then the difference with "Ancient" as proposed is only the 5th century. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since some of the contents of "4th-century Christian martyrs" are ante-Nicene, it can remain as a subcategory, the same as "Ford" could remain under "20th-century automobile manufacturers" even though it continues in business in the 21st century. Subcategories will often be partial matches for multiple parent categories. P Aculeius (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- So what do you suggest we do with Category:4th-century Christian martyrs with its many articles not specifying a year or specifying a year after 325? Should this subcategory be purged? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Before the reign of Constantine (312–337) Christianity was widely persecuted, so there would have been many Christians martyred within the Roman empire. Though various dates from 311 (edict of Serdica) to 337 (death, and alleged deathbed conversion of Constantine, who may or may not have adopted Christianity informally as early as 312) could be used, the council of Nicaea, which he convened in 325, is a significant date in establishing a degree of uniformity for Christian worship, and probably did more to promote its acceptance than dubious stories about the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. After this it would be rare for Christians to be martyred within the Roman Empire, though of course they could be anywhere else that Christianity wasn't yet tolerated or adopted, and would continue to be for centuries. So it makes good sense to distinguish martyrs before 325 and after—or at least martyrs due to Roman persecution, which probably did not end all at once as soon as some decree was issued at Rome, though it probably had by the end of Constantine's reign—from later martyrs elsewhere. P Aculeius (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- There are enough articles just mentioning a death in the 4th century without specifying whether it was before or after 325, so the distinction isn't clear anyway. Besides Christianity became an accepted religion quite a few years before Nicaea. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Lots of productive discussion (good!); what does that mean for this category?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)- Well, I'm thinking we should keep this category as-is, a subcategory of Christian martyrs, which is already synonymous with the suggested "Ancient Christian martyrs", although I have no objection to substituting that title for the parent category. "Ante-Nicene Christian martyrs" seems like a valid distinction within the parent category, whatever that's called, since the reasons and occasions for martyrdom post-Nicaea make those persons distinguishable. P Aculeius (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on P Aculeius's most recent comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:National highways
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Categorisation by WP:SHAREDNAME that means different things in each of the different countries with member subcategories. I added Category:Highways by country to those that weren't already included via a parent, so it's now redundant. Paul_012 (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Does it really mean different things? I would expect it means (everywhere) that they are owned by the national government rather than by states or provinces. Maybe still delete as a trivial intersection. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- In Thailand at least, "national highway" is just one class out of several that are owned by the national government. The other classes are included under Category:Highways in Thailand. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- So it still means they are owned by national government, just like in other countries. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- In Thailand at least, "national highway" is just one class out of several that are owned by the national government. The other classes are included under Category:Highways in Thailand. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's latest comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:23, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Virtual reality pioneers
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: From Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_January_19#Virtual_reality_->_Extended_reality:
–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Please renominate "Virtual reality pioneers" separately. The term is generally only used in retrospect and I don't think it's controversial to say VR is still developing in a way that it's hard for us to say who is and isn't a pioneer from the present vantage point.
— User:Axem Titanium 23:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)- Oppose (keep). All the nominated categories can be kept without any deletions or renamings instead. 67.209.130.111 (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- I am not for or against the proposal, just noting that this last oppose vote should be discounted, as it does not provide any rationale for opposing. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose (keep). All the nominated categories can be kept without any deletions or renamings instead. 67.209.130.111 (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Rename to Virtual reality people. I didn't mean to imply it's a useless category in my previous comment, just that pioneer is the wrong word to use here. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- If not kept, rename is probably a better solution than deletion. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Bombycillidae
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Bombycillidae to Category:Bombycilloidea
- Nominator's rationale: Bombycillidae is a monogeneric family. Nurg (talk) 01:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Music generated games
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Music generated games to Category:?
- Nominator's rationale: Raised by Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_January_10#Category:Video_games_with_custom_soundtrack_support due to its unclear title. The long description is mostly WP:OR, and defines the topic as video games that can read CD inputs. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Music-generated games are games in which the gameplay is generatively determined in a meaningful way by musical input. This is accomplished, in music-generated video games, by associating in-game elements such as landscape or enemy attack formations with elements from the musical input via waveform analysis algorithms. Musical input typically consists of a standard CD in Red Book audio format. With musical input in this format, the game software will load into the console's RAM and allow the removal of the game disc such that any musical CD of the player's choosing may be inserted and accessed during the game. This allows for essentially limitless gameplay variability and is intended to enhance replay value. Other music-generated video games do not allow the player to select his own input, but instead use pre-determined musical input generatively. Such games allow the designers to employ any musical format of their choosing thereby enabling maximal compression and thus maximal pre-determined song library. Generative portions of such games typically derive from music visualization algorithms. Although music-generated games are typically classified as music games, there is no requirement that a music-generated game must fall under this genre or even that the player must hear the music serving to determine gameplay. Furthermore, since gameplay determination is required, games which allow nothing more than a custom soundtrack do not fit the definition of a music-generated game. |
- Comment, some articles mention that they are about a rhythm game, is this possibly a better scope of a category? Marcocapelle (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Some of the members should be or already are included under Category:Rhythm games, but not all of them fall under the category. Generating gameplay content based on music input should probably be a defining aspect of these games, but other than a Steam Curator list[1] I'm only seeing Reddit and other forum posts that discuss them as a grouping. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Paul_012's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Former churches by populated place
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Former churches in Adelaide (2) to Category:Churches in Adelaide and Category:Former churches in South Australia
- Propose merging Category:Former churches in Hobart (1) to Category:Churches in Hobart
- Propose merging Category:Former churches in Melbourne (2) to Category:Churches in Melbourne, Category:Former churches in Victoria (state), and Category:Former buildings and structures in Melbourne
- Propose merging Category:Former church buildings in Perth, Western Australia (1) to Category:Churches in Perth, Western Australia, Category:Former church buildings in Western Australia, and Category:Former buildings and structures in Perth, Western Australia
- Propose merging Category:Former churches in Washington, D.C. (2) to Category:Former churches in the United States, Category:Churches in Washington, D.C., and Category:Former buildings and structures in Washington, D.C.
- Propose merging Category:Former churches in Hamburg (2) to Category:Churches in Hamburg and Category:Former churches in Germany
- Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures in Frysztak (1) to Category:Religious buildings and structures in Subcarpathian Voivodeship
- Propose merging Category:Churches in Chittagong (1) to Category:Religious buildings and structures in Chittagong
- Propose merging Category:Churches in Belmopan (2) to Category:Buildings and structures in Belmopan and Category:Churches in Belize
- Propose merging Category:Churches in Limassol (2) to Category:Buildings and structures in Limassol
- Propose merging Category:Churches in Ramallah (2) to Category:Churches in the West Bank and Category:Buildings and structures in Ramallah
- Propose merging Category:Churches in San Salvador (2) to Category:Buildings and structures in San Salvador
- Propose merging Category:Churches in Tashkent (2) to Category:Buildings and structures in Tashkent and Category:Religion in Tashkent
- Propose merging Category:Roman Catholic churches in Cairns (1) to Category:Buildings and structures in Cairns
- Propose merging Category:Roman Catholic churches in Kecskemét (1) to Category:Buildings and structures in Kecskemét
- Propose merging Category:Roman Catholic churches in Palanga (1) to Category:Buildings and structures in Palanga
- Propose merging Category:Roman Catholic chapels in Macau (2) to Category:Chapels in Macau, Category:Roman Catholic churches in Macau, and Category:Roman Catholic chapels in China
- Propose merging Category:Roman Catholic chapels in Madrid (2) to Category:Roman Catholic chapels in Spain and Category:Roman Catholic churches in Madrid
- Propose merging Category:Chapels in Richmond, Virginia (2) to Category:Churches in Richmond, Virginia and Category:Chapels in the United States
- Propose deleting Category:Former churches in Tasmania (1)
- Propose deleting Category:Former religious buildings and structures in Washington, D.C. (1)
- Propose deleting Category:Buildings and structures in Frysztak (1)
- Propose deleting Category:Churches in Kecskemét (1)
- Propose deleting Category:Churches in Palanga (1)
- Nominator's rationale: All contain 1-2 articles. Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge all per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)